SolarGas Part 2: Why it’s so useful

In yesterday’s post you saw how we make SolarGas™. Here, I’ll take you through some of the ways it can be used. As you can see in the diagram below, it’s a versatile product.

I’ll explain a few of these uses point-by-point. The numbers refer to the diagram.

1. SolarGas can be burned to get heat or electricity

SolarGas is a combustible fuel, just like the original natural gas – but here’s the important thing: if you burn it, you get around 25% more energy than there was in the original natural gas. This extra energy is the ‘solar upgrade’.

For example, if you were to use SolarGas in your gas stove to boil five eggs for breakfast, it’d be as if you were cooking one of those eggs with pure solar power. (The energy for the other four would have come from what was already present in the original natural gas). You can also think about it like this: you’ve boiled five eggs, but you’ve only generated the greenhouse gas emissions associated with boiling four. Or, to put it yet another way, five eggs have been boiled, but we only had to take enough natural gas out of the ground to cook four.

Likewise, if we’re talking about burning the gas in a 5 megawatt turbine to make electricity, it’s like we’re getting five megawatts for the environmental ‘price’ of four. Given that natural gas use is projected to remain a significant source of energy in Australia in the coming decades, wouldn’t it be great if we could in effect get a bonus amount of energy from the resources we have, by adding solar power?

2. SolarGas can be used to build transport fuels

The SolarGas molecules are extremely nifty and useful little chemical building blocks. They are ideal for connecting together in a process called Fischer-Tropsch to make fuels like methanol or diesel.
These building blocks are so useful, in fact, that there already exists a significant industry that makes them using more traditional methods. In the traditional process the extra energy in the product gas, which is called Synthesis Gas or syngas for short, comes not from the sun, but by burning part of the natural gas.

By using the SolarGas process instead of the traditional syngas process, we end up with the same product but with less consumption of fossil fuels, and less production of greenhouse gases. And again, if you used the product fuel to run a car, that car would be partly powered by sunshine.

3. SolarGas can be used to make hydrogen

SolarGas is already 3/4 hydrogen gas by volume, but we can increase the amount of hydrogen by putting it through what’s called a Shift Reactor. Ever see all those episodes of Top Gear where they speculate on a future where our cars run off hydrogen fuel? Hydrogen is only truly environmentally friendly if it’s made using renewables – and this process goes a long way towards satisfying this requirement.

For example, most of the hydrogen produced in the world today is made by the traditional syngas process described above – which burns natural gas to get the energy required. Globally, this process is used to produce about 80 million tonnes of hydrogen every year (and growing!), which creates about 1.5 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide… which is about three times Australia’s annual emissions. What a difference we could make if SolarGas becomes the process of future industry.

4. The stored solar energy can be recovered in the form of heat.

If we wanted, we could extract the solar energy from the SolarGas by reversing the original reaction. This recreates the original natural gas – which can be re-used – and releases the solar energy in the form of heat at about 300°C. In essence, then, the natural gas is in a ‘closed-loop’ system – it goes round and round, picking up solar energy, storing it until it’s needed, releasing it, and then starting the cycle again.

5. Waste heat from making SolarGas can be put to other uses

No matter what is done with the SolarGas, in the process of making it there’ll be some ‘waste’ heat. As with the last scenario, this heat will be at temperatures lower than the original 800°C (otherwise we’d use it to produce more SolarGas). Even so, it’s a whole lot of energy that we can use to provide further efficiency by combining it with other processes.  In the future, this ‘waste’ heat – the stuff that disappears up the chimney in conventional processes – will be used to provide further benefits like industrial process heat, air-conditioning and refrigeration  and water desalination.

So that’s my go at explaining why we at CSIRO think SolarGas is a great project to be developing. Of course, there’s always more to read on the CSIRO website as well. Any further questions? Leave a comment!


4 Comments on “SolarGas Part 2: Why it’s so useful”

  1. Lloyd (Mildura) says:

    Solargas sounds great. Would it be fair to say that it is a variation of Concentrator Solar Thermal for electricity production? One of the draw backs of solar electricity is that it has down times overnight or in cloudy weather and is therefore unsuitable for baseload electricity. Could Solargas could be used to overcome these down times?

  2. Jack Ellis (Wagait Beach via Darwin) says:

    This is fascinating stuff. I’d like to know just how much gas the Newcastle facility can produce on a sunny spring day and how cost effective it could be ultimately when the cost of installing and maintaining the solar system is considered. Great practical science in the true CSIRO tradition.

    • Tania says:

      Hi Jack, thanks for the comment. The SolarGas reactor we’re currently operating in Newcastle is designed to receive 200 (thermal) kilowatts of solar energy. At its design point it processes just under 20 kg of natural gas per hour. This system is intended to modular; that is, it can be scaled up by placing multiple fields adjacent to each other. It’s more difficult to give you a hard figure for your second question, because the cost per unit energy will be highly dependent on the location of the plant. We do believe it will be a very cost effective technology and a lot of our efforts here at CSIRO are going into reducing the component and system costs even more.

  3. Graham says:

    I know we can’t just switch off fossil fuels overnight and this helps us progress down the path of fossil fuel reduction. I just don’t know if the slowly, slowly method of reducing our usage (eg. 25% reduction) will get us to where we need to be in time.

    From my viewpoint Option 4, the closed loop, sounds like one of the more promising uses from an emissions point of view. Can we generate steam based electricity from 300C temps? It’s above the boiling point of water and I thought I read somewhere that there are low temp generators available? Storing gas may also be easier than storing molten salt for solar thermal generating stations.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s